Open Access
Issue |
Res. Des. Nucl. Eng.
Volume 1, 2025
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 2025002 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/rdne/2025002 | |
Published online | 04 July 2025 |
- World Nuclear Association, World nuclear performance report (2023). [Google Scholar]
- China Earthquake Administration (CEA), Standard for seismic design of nuclear power plants, GB 50267–2019 (China Planning Press, Beijing, 2019). [Google Scholar]
- American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures and commentary (ASCE/SEI Standard, Reston, VA, 2017). [Google Scholar]
- Y. Shumuta, Damage and Restoration of Electric Power System due to the 2011 Earthquake off the Pacific Coast of Tōhoku-Effects of a Damage Estimation System for Electric Power Distribution Equipment (RAMPEr) (International Efforts in Lifeline Earthquake Engineering. ASCE, 2014), pp. 81–88. [Google Scholar]
- R.Y. Mei, J.B. Li, G. Lin, et al., Evaluation of the vibration response of third generation nuclear power plants with isolation technology under large commercial aircraft impact. Prog. Nucl. Energy 120, 103230 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- Y. Liu, J.B. Li, G. Lin, Seismic performance of advanced three-dimensional base-isolated nuclear structures in complex-layered sites, Eng. Struct. 289, 116247 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- Z. Zhou, J. Wong, S. Mahin, Potentiality of using vertical and three-dimensional isolation systems in nuclear structures, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 48, 1237–1251 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- M. Forni, A. Poggianti, Dusi A. Seismic isolation of nuclear power plants, in: World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (2012), pp. 636–639. [Google Scholar]
- R.S. Malushte, S.A. Whittaker, Survey of past base isolation applications in nuclear power plants and challenges to industry/regulatory acceptance, in: Transactions of the 18th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (2005), pp. 3404–3410. [Google Scholar]
- Y.Z. Wu, D. Yao, L.H. Wu, et al., Seismic performance investigation of PCS water tank designed as tuned mass damper (TMD) for nuclear containment plant considering soil-structure interaction, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 186, 108937 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- Z.Q. Sun, M. Zhao, Z.D. Gao, et al., Seismic mitigation performance of a periodic foundation for nuclear power structures considering soil-structure interactions, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 184, 108814 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- J.P. Wolf, Dynamic soil-structure interaction (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1985). [Google Scholar]
- J.P. Wolf, Dynamic soil-structure interaction analysis in time-domain (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988). [Google Scholar]
- L. Tunon-Sanjur, R.S. Orr, S. Tinic, D.P. Ruiz, Finite element modeling of the AP1000 nuclear island for seismic analyses at generic soil and rock sites, Nucl Eng Des. 237, 147–185 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- H.K. Mistry, D. Lombardi, Role of SSI on seismic performance of nuclear reactors: a case study for a UK nuclear site, Nucl. Eng. Des. 364, 110691 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- J.B. Li, M. Chen, Z. Li, Improved soil-structure interaction model considering time-lag effect, Comput. Geotech. 148, 104835 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- H. Lv, S.L. Chen, Seismic response characteristics of nuclear island structure at generic soil and rock sites, Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 22, 667–688 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- J.B. Liu, Y.X. Du, Z.Y. Wang, et al., 3D viscous-spring artificial boundary in time domain, Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 1(5), 93–101 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- X.L. Du, M. Zhao, J.T. Wang, A stress artificial boundary in FEA for near-field wave problem, Chin. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 38 (1), 49–56 (2006), in Chinese. [Google Scholar]
- P.P. Martin, H.B. Seed, A computer program for the non-linear analysis of vertically propagating shear waves in horizontally layered deposits (University of California at Berkeley, San Francisco, 1978). [Google Scholar]
- A. Amorosi, D. Boldini, Numerical modelling of the transverse dynamic behavior of circular tunnels in clayey soils, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 29, 1059–1072 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- M. Zhao, H. Yin, X. Du, et al., 1D finite element artificial boundary method for layered half space site response from obliquely incident earthquake, Earthq. Struct. 22, 173–194 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- M. Zhao, Q. Ding, S. Cao, et al., Large-scale seismic soil-structure interaction analysis via efficient finite element modeling and multi-GPU parallel explicit algorithm. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 39, 1886–1908 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- G.B. Warburton, Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 10, 381–401 (1982). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.