| Issue |
Res. Des. Nucl. Eng.
Volume 2, 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 2025013 | |
| Number of page(s) | 20 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/rdne/2025013 | |
| Published online | 19 May 2026 | |
Effects of diameter on interfacial structure in horizontal two-phase flow: A review
1
State Key Laboratory of Marine Thermal Energy and Power, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, PR China
2
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06800, Türkiye
* e-mails: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
(Shouxu Qiao); This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
(Sichao Tan)
Received:
30
June
2025
Accepted:
31
December
2025
Abstract
This review critically examines the effect of pipe diameter on interfacial structure and flow regime transitions in horizontal gas–liquid two-phase flows by analyzing experimental, theoretical and computational studies. It is demonstrated that diameter dramatically alters the balance of gravitational, inertial and surface-tension forces, producing diameter-dependent interfacial structure. In pipes exceeding 100 mm, annular and intermittent flow regimes are delayed and dispersed flow prevails, whereas in smaller diameters, enhanced interfacial effects foster bubbly and slug flows. Stratified flow persists to higher gas velocities in larger pipes, and slug frequency decreases roughly in inverse proportional to diameter, reflecting the stabilizing effect of increased cross-section. Void fraction distributions and wave dynamics likewise shift from Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities in small tubes to roll wave formation in larger diameter pipes. Current models often underpredict transitions in large diameter pipes, where reduced slug frequency and modified holdup profiles emerge. This work elucidates the mechanisms of slug stability, bubble coalescence, and wave growth, identifies gaps in transient dynamics, two-phase interactions, and fluid property influences, and recommend large-scale experiments, high-resolution diagnostics, refined dimensionless group frameworks, Reynolds number, Froude number, and Eötvös number and advanced Computational Fluid Dynamics scaling approaches to guide diameter-specific design in energy and process engineering.
Key words: Two-phase flow / Diameter effects / Interfacial structure / Flow regime transitions / Void fraction
© The Author(s) 2026. Published by EDP Sciences.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.
