Open Access
Review
| Issue |
Res. Des. Nucl. Eng.
Volume 2, 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 2025013 | |
| Number of page(s) | 20 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/rdne/2025013 | |
| Published online | 19 May 2026 | |
- J.M. Mandhane, G.A. Gregory, K. Aziz, A flow pattern map for gas-liquid flow in horizontal pipes, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 1(4), 537–553 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(74)90006-8. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Taitel, A.E. Dukler, A model for predicting flow regime transitions in horizontal and near horizontal gas-liquid flow, AIChE J. 22(1), 47–55 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690220105. [Google Scholar]
- R. Kong, S. Kim, S. Bajorek, K. Tien, C. Hoxie, Effects of pipe size on horizontal two-phase flow: Flow regimes, pressure drop, two-phase flow parameters, and drift-flux analysis, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 96, 75–89 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.02.030. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Wang, Y. Yu, Z. Liu, Y. Chang, X. Zhao, Q. Wang, Experimental study on gas–liquid two-phase stratified flow at high pressure in a horizontal pipe, Energies 17(5), 1056 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/en17051056. [Google Scholar]
- A. Deendarlianto, A. Rahmandhika, A. Widyatama, O. Dinaryanto, A. Widyaparaga, Indarto, Experimental study on the hydrodynamic behavior of gas–liquid air–water two-phase flow near the transition to slug flow in horizontal pipes, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 130, 187–203 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.10.085. [Google Scholar]
- P.Y. Lin, T.J. Hanratty, Effect of pipe diameter on flow patterns for air–water flow in horizontal pipes, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 13(4), 549–563 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(87)90021-8. [Google Scholar]
- A. Bouderbal, Y. Salhi, A. Arabi, E.-K. Si-Ahmed, J. Legrand, A. Arhaliass, Experimental investigation of different sub-regimes in horizontal stratified and intermittent gas–liquid two-phase flow: Flow map and analysis of pressure drop fluctuations, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 210, 407–424 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2024.08.029. [Google Scholar]
- M. Colombo, M. Fairweather, Prediction of bubbly flow and flow regime development in a horizontal air–water pipe flow with a morphology-adaptive multifluid CFD model, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 184, 105112 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2024.105112. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Zhou, Y. Ran, Q. Liu, S. Zhang, Investigation on void fraction of gas–liquid two-phase flow in horizontal pipe under fluctuating vibration, Nucl. Eng. Des. 431, 113710 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113710. [Google Scholar]
- S.A. Ahmed, B. John, Liquid–Liquid horizontal pipe flow – A review, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 168, 426–447 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.04.012. [Google Scholar]
- N. Brauner, A. Ullmann, Modelling of flow pattern transitions in small diameter horizontal and inclined tubes, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 148, 110965 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2023.110965. [Google Scholar]
- D. Bestion, The difficult challenge of a two-phase CFD modelling for all flow regimes, Nucl. Eng. Des. 279, 116–125 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.04.006. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Cao, Q. Xu, H. Yu, B. Huang, T. Liu, L. Guo, Influence of pipeline diameters and fluid properties on slug frequency in horizontal pipelines, Chem. Eng. Sci. 283, 119397 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2023.119397. [Google Scholar]
- J. Weisman, D. Duncan, J. Gibson, T. Crawford, Effects of fluid properties and pipe diameter on two-phase flow patterns in horizontal lines, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 5(6), 437–462 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(79)90031-4. [Google Scholar]
- W.P. Jepson, R.E. Taylor, Slug flow and its transitions in large-diameter horizontal pipes, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 19(3), 411–420 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(93)90057-2. [Google Scholar]
- G.A. Gregory, M.K. Nicholson, K. Aziz, Correlation of the liquid volume fraction in the slug for horizontal gas–liquid slug flow, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 4(1), 33–39 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(78)90023-X. [Google Scholar]
- T. Al-Wahaibi, Y. Al-Wahaibi, A. Al-Ajmi, R. Al-Hajri, N. Yusuf, A.S. Olawale, I.A. Mohammed, Experimental investigation on flow patterns and pressure gradient through two pipe diameters in horizontal oil–water flows, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 122, 266–273 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2014.07.019. [Google Scholar]
- Z. Li, G. Wang, M. Yousaf, X. Yang, M. Ishii, Flow structure and flow regime transitions of downward two-phase flow in large diameter pipes, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 118, 812–822 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.11.037. [Google Scholar]
- R. Kong, S. Kim, S. Bajorek, K. Tien, C. Hoxie, Experimental investigation of horizontal air–water bubbly-to-plug and bubbly-to-slug transition flows in a 3.81 cm ID pipe, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 94, 137–155 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.04.020. [Google Scholar]
- P. Abduvayt, R. Manabe, N. Arihara, Effects of pressure and pipe diameter on gas–liquid two-phase flow behavior in pipelines, in: Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado (2003), p. 15. https://doi.org/10.2118/84229-MS. [Google Scholar]
- O.J. Nydal, S. Pintus, P. Andreussi, Statistical characterization of slug flow in horizontal pipes, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 18(3), 439–453 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(92)90027-E. [Google Scholar]
- D. Barnea, Y. Luninski, Y. Taitel, Flow pattern in horizontal and vertical two phase flow in small diameter pipes, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 61(5), 617–620 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450610501. [Google Scholar]
- J. Fabre, A. Liné, Modeling of two-phase slug flow, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24, 21–46 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.24.010192.000321. [Google Scholar]
- A.E. Dukler, M.G. Hubbard, A model for gas–liquid slug flow in horizontal and near horizontal tubes, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 14(4), 337–347 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1021/i160056a011. [Google Scholar]
- K.H. Bendiksen, An experimental investigation of the motion of long bubbles in inclined tubes, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 10(4), 467–483 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(84)90057-0. [Google Scholar]
- B.D. Woods, Z. Fan, T.J. Hanratty, Frequency and development of slugs in a horizontal pipe at large liquid flows, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 32(8), 902–925 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2006.02.020. [Google Scholar]
- Z. Fan, F. Lusseyran, T.J. Hanratty, Initiation of slugs in horizontal gas-liquid flows, AIChE J. 39(11), 1741–1753 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690391102. [Google Scholar]
- E.J. Greskovich, A.L. Shrier, Pressure drop and holdup in horizontal slug flow, AIChE J. 17(5), 1214–1219 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690170529. [Google Scholar]
- M.A. Tarahomi, M. Emamzadeh, M. Ameri, Scaling two-phase gas–liquid flow in horizontal pipes, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 200, 592–601 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2023.11.029. [Google Scholar]
- M. Ottens, H.C.J. Hoefsloot, P.J. Hamersma, Correlations predicting liquid hold-up and pressure gradient in steady-state (nearly) horizontal co-current gas–liquid pipe flow, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 79(5), 581–592 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1205/02638760152424361. [Google Scholar]
- G. Gonçalves Da Silva, S. Vieira, M.S.D. Castro, F. Jaloretto Da Silva, Study of the pipe diameter effect on horizontal air–water two-phase flow, in: Procceedings of the 24th ABCM International Congress of Mechanicl Engineering (ABCM, 2017). https://doi.org/10.26678/abcm.cobem2017.cob17-1591. [Google Scholar]
- M. Fossa, G. Guglielmini, A. Marchitto, Intermittent flow parameters from void fraction analysis, Flow Meas. Instrum. 14(4–5), 161–168 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-5986(03)00021-9. [Google Scholar]
- L. Galbiati, P. Andreini, The transition between stratified and annular regimes for horizontal two-phase flow in small diameter tubes, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 19(2), 185–190 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1933(92)90030-L. [Google Scholar]
- J.P. Brill, Z. Schmidt, W.A. Coberly, J.D. Herring, D.W. Moore, Analysis of two-phase tests in large-diameter flow lines in Prudhoe Bay field, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 21(3), 3 (1981). https://doi.org/10.2118/8305-PA. [Google Scholar]
- N. Andritsos, T.J. Hanratty, Interfacial instabilities for horizontal gas–liquid flows in pipelines, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 13(5), 583–603 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(87)90037-1. [Google Scholar]
- N. Brauner, D.M. Maron, Analysis of stratified/nonstratified transitional boundaries in horizontal gas–liquid flows, Chem. Eng. Sci. 46(7), 1849–1859 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(91)87031-7. [Google Scholar]
- W. Lam Loh, V. Hernandez-Perez, N.D. Tam, T. Teik Wan, Z. Yuqiao, V.K. Premanadhan, Experimental study of the effect of pressure and gas density on the transition from stratified to slug flow in a horizontal pipe, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 85, 196–208 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.06.005. [Google Scholar]
- M. Akhlaghi, V. Mohammadi, N.M. Nouri, M. Taherkhani, M. Karimi, Multi-Fluid VoF model assessment to simulate the horizontal air–water intermittent flow, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 152, 48–59 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.09.031. [Google Scholar]
- Z. Ruder, P.J. Hanratty, T.J. Hanratty, Necessary conditions for the existence of stable slugs, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 15(2), 209–226 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(89)90071-2. [Google Scholar]
- I. Barmak, A. Gelfgat, N. Brauner, Instability of stratified air–water flows in circular pipes, Phys. Rev. Fluids. 9(9), 093901 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.093901. [Google Scholar]
- P. Andreussi, L.N. Persen, Stratified gas–liquid flow in downwardly inclined pipes, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 13(4), 565–575 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(87)90022-X. [Google Scholar]
- N. Andritsos, L. Williams, T.J. Hanratty, Effect of liquid viscosity on the stratified-slug transition in horizontal pipe flow, Int. J. Multiph. Flow 15(6), 877–892 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(89)90017-7. [Google Scholar]
- N. Brauner, D.M. Maron, Identification of the range of “small diameters” conduits, regarding two-phase flow pattern transitions, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Trans. 19(1), 29–39 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1933(92)90061-L. [Google Scholar]
- D. Schubring, T.A. Shedd, Wave behavior in horizontal annular air–water flow, Int. J. Multiph. Flow 34(7), 636–646 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2008.01.004. [Google Scholar]
- B. Bae, T. Ahn, J. Jeong, K. Kim, B. Yun, Characteristics of an interfacial wave in a horizontal air–water stratified flow, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 97, 197–205 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.08.009. [Google Scholar]
- M. Ottens, K. Klinkspoor, H.C.J. Hoefsloot, P.J. Hamersma, Wave characteristics during cocurrent gas±liquid pipe flow, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 9(3), 140–150 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1777(99)00014-X. [Google Scholar]
- A. Soleimani, T.J. Hanratty, Critical liquid flows for the transition from the pseudo-slug and stratified patterns to slug flow, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 29(1), 51–67 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9322(02)00124-6. [Google Scholar]
- U. Kadri, R.F. Mudde, R.V.A. Oliemans, M. Bonizzi, P. Andreussi, Prediction of the transition from stratified to slug flow or roll-waves in gas–liquid horizontal pipes, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 35(11), 1001–1010 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2009.07.002. [Google Scholar]
- T.J. Hanratty, A. Hershman, Initiation of roll waves, AIChE J. 7(3), 488–497 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690070330. [Google Scholar]
- T.K. Mandal, D.P. Chakrabarti, G. Das, Oil water flow through different diameter pipes, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 85(8), 1123–1128 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1205/cherd06036. [Google Scholar]
- J.W. Coleman, S. Garimella, Characterization of two-phase flow patterns in small diameter round and rectangular tubes, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 42(15), 2869–2881 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(98)00362-7. [Google Scholar]
- B. Sun, H. Chang, Y.-L. Zhou, Flow regime recognition and dynamic characteristics analysis of air–water flow in horizontal channel under nonlinear oscillation based on multi-scale entropy, Entropy 21(7), 667 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/e21070667. [Google Scholar]
- A.Z. Hudaya, H.Y. Kuntoro, O. Dinaryanto, Deendarlianto, Indarto, Experimental investigation on the interfacial characteristics of stratified air–water two-phase flow in a horizontal pipe, in: Presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd Aun/Seed-Net Regional Conference on Energy Engineering and the 7th International Conference on Thermofluids (Rcene/Thermofluid 2015) (Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2016), p. 040012. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4949300. [Google Scholar]
- T.R. Smith, J.P. Schlegel, T. Hibiki, M. Ishii, Two-phase flow structure in large diameter pipes, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow. 33(1), 156–167 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2011.10.008. [Google Scholar]
- U. Kadri, R.A.W.M. Henkes, R.F. Mudde, R.V.A. Oliemans, Effect of gas pulsation on long slugs in horizontal gas–liquid pipe flow, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 37(9), 1120–1128 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.07.003. [Google Scholar]
- S.G. Haile, E. Woschke, G.S. Tibba, V. Pandey, Internal two-phase flow induced vibrations: A review, Cogent Eng. 9(1), 2083472 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2083472. [Google Scholar]
- H.-M. Prasser, M. Beyer, A. Böttger, H. Carl, D. Lucas, Influence of the pipe diameter on the structure of the gas–liquid interface in a vertical two-phase pipe flow, Nucl. Technol. 152(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.13182/NT05-A3657. [Google Scholar]
- Q. Lu, Y. Liu, J. Deng, X. Luo, Z. Deng, Z. Mi, Review of interdisciplinary heat transfer enhancement technology for nuclear reactor, Annal. Nucl. Energy. 159, 108302 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108302. [Google Scholar]
- J. Hart, P.J. Hamersma, J.M.H. Fortuin, Correlations predicting frictional pressure drop and liquid holdup during horizontal gas–liquid pipe flow with a small liquid holdup, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 15(6), 947–964 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(89)90023-2. [Google Scholar]
- P. Andreussi, K. Bendiksen, An investigation of void fraction in liquid slugs for horizontal and inclined gas–liquid pipe flow, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 15(6), 937–946 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(89)90022-0. [Google Scholar]
- A. Widyatama, O. Dinaryanto, Indarto, and Deendarlianto, The development of image processing technique to study the interfacial behavior of air–water slug two-phase flow in horizontal pipes, Flow Meas. Instrum. 59, 168–180 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2017.12.015. [Google Scholar]
- D. Bestion, The physical closure laws in the CATHARE code, Nucl. Eng. Des. 124(3), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(90)90294-8. [Google Scholar]
- L.C. Ruspini, C.P. Marcel, A. Clausse, Two-phase flow instabilities: A review, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 71, 521–548 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.12.047. [Google Scholar]
- T. Höhne, J.-P. Mehlhoop, Validation of closure models for interfacial drag and turbulence in numerical simulations of horizontal stratified gas–liquid flows, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 62, 1–16 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.01.012. [Google Scholar]
- R. Kong, Q. Zhu, S. Kim, M. Ishii, S. Bajorek, K. Tien, C. Hoxie, Void fraction prediction and one-dimensional drift-flux analysis for horizontal two-phase flow in different pipe sizes, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 99, 433–445 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.08.019. [Google Scholar]
- J. Xu, Y. Wu, Y. Chang, J. Guo, Experimental investigation on the holdup distribution of oil–water two-phase flow in horizontal parallel tubes, Chem. Eng. Technol. 31(10), 1536–1540 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200800206. [Google Scholar]
- H. Barati, T. Hibiki, Integrating the two-group drift-flux and Sauter mean diameter models to predict the interfacial area concentration for gas–liquid flows in large-diameter pipes, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 164, 108747 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.108747. [Google Scholar]
- L. Lei, J. An, F. Liang, C. Cheng, N. Zhou, Y. Ning, Z. Zhang, An experimental study on the void fraction for gas–liquid two-phase flows in a horizontal pipe, Fluid Dyn. Mater. Process. 17(5), 1037–1048 (2021). https://doi.org/10.32604/fdmp.2021.016081. [Google Scholar]
- L. Rossi, R. De Fayard, S. Kassab, Measurements using X-ray attenuation vertical distribution of the void fraction for different flow regimes in a horizontal pipe, Nucl. Eng. Des. 336, 129–140 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.07.037. [Google Scholar]
- G.A. Gregory, L. Mattar, An in-situ volume fraction sensor for two-phase flows of non-electrolytes, J. Can. Pet. Technol. 12(2), (1973). https://doi.org/10.2118/73-02-06. [Google Scholar]
- R. Kong, A. Rau, C. Lu, J. Gamber, S. Kim, Experimental study of interfacial structure of horizontal air–water two-phase flow in a 101.6 mm ID pipe, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 93, 57–72 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.12.016. [Google Scholar]
- G. Kocamustafaogullari, W.D. Huang, J. Razi, Measurement and modeling of average void fraction, bubble size and interfacial area, Nucl. Eng. Des., 148(2–3), 437–453 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(94)90124-4. [Google Scholar]
- S. Qiao, S. Kim, Interfacial area transport across a 90 vertical-upward elbow in air–water bubbly two-phase flow, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 85, 110–122 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.05.015. [Google Scholar]
- D. Ryan, D. Kang, A. Dix, Z. Quan, S. Kim, Interfacial area transport modeling of air–water bubbly two-phase flows in inclined orientations, Nucl. Eng. Des. 428, 113530 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113530. [Google Scholar]
- H. Chen, S. Wei, W. Ding, H. Wei, L. Li, Interfacial area transport equation for bubble coalescence and breakup: developments and comparisons, Entropy 23(9), 1106 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/e23091106. [Google Scholar]
- R. Kong, S. Qiao, S. Kim, S. Bajorek, K. Tien, C. Hoxie, Interfacial area transport models for horizontal air–water bubbly flow in different pipe sizes, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 106, 46–59 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.05.009. [Google Scholar]
- S. Kim, M. Ishii, R. Kong, G. Wang, Progress in two-phase flow modeling: Interfacial area transport, Nucl. Eng. Des. 373, 111019 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.111019. [Google Scholar]
- G.H. Abdul-Majeed, A.M. Al-Mashat, A unified correlation for predicting slug liquid holdup in viscous two-phase flow for pipe inclination from horizontal to vertical, SN Appl. Sci. 1(1), 71 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-018-0081-0. [Google Scholar]
- L.E. Gomez, O. Shoham, Y. Taitel, Prediction of slug liquid holdup: horizontal to upward vertical flow, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 26(3), 517–527 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9322(99)00025-7. [Google Scholar]
- E. Al-Safran, C. Kora, C. Sarica, Prediction of slug liquid holdup in high viscosity liquid and gas two-phase flow in horizontal pipes, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 133, 566–575 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.06.032. [Google Scholar]
- R. Kong, A. Rau, S. Kim, S. Bajorek, K. Tien, C. Hoxie, Experimental study of horizontal air–water plug-to-slug transition flow in different pipe sizes, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 123, 1005–1020 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.03.027. [Google Scholar]
- M. Ishii, N. Zuber, Drag coefficient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows, AIChE J. 25(5), 843–855 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690250513. [Google Scholar]
- M. Bottin, J.P. Berlandis, E. Hervieu, M. Lance, M. Marchand, O.C. Öztürk, G. Serre, Experimental investigation of a developing two-phase bubbly flow in horizontal pipe, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 60, 161–179 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.12.010. [Google Scholar]
- J. Yang, M. Zhang, C. Zhang, Y. Su, X. Zhu, Quasi 3-D measurements of turbulence structure in horizontal air–water bubbly flow, Nucl. Eng. Des. 227(3), 301–312 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2003.11.009. [Google Scholar]
- A. Iskandrani, G. Kojasoy, Local void fraction and velocity field description in horizontal bubbly flow, Nucl. Eng Des. 204(1–3), 117–128 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(00)00361-7. [Google Scholar]
- P. Andreussi, A. Paglianti, F.S. Silva, Dispersed bubble flow in horizontal pipes, Chem. Eng. Sci. 54(8), 1101–1107 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00289-9. [Google Scholar]
- J.D. Talley, T. Worosz, S. Kim, Characterization of horizontal air–water two-phase flow in a round pipe part II: Measurement of local two-phase parameters in bubbly flow, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 76, 223–236 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.06.012. [Google Scholar]
- M.K. Nicholson, K. Aziz, G.A. Gregory, Intermittent two phase flow in horizontal pipes: Predictive models, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 56(6), 653–663 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450560601. [Google Scholar]
- G.A. Gregory, D.S. Scott, Correlation of liquid slug velocity and frequency in horizontal cocurrent gas-liquid slug flow, AIChE J. 15(6), 933–935 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690150623. [Google Scholar]
- E.E. Zukoski, Influence of viscosity, surface tension, and inclination angle on motion of long bubbles in closed tubes, J. Fluid Mech. 25(4), 821–837 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112066000442. [Google Scholar]
- T.B. Benjamin, Gravity currents and related phenomena, J. Fluid Mech. 31(2), 209–248 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112068000133. [Google Scholar]
- F. França, R.T. Lahey, The use of drift-flux techniques for the analysis of horizontal two-phase flows, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 18(6), 787–801 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(92)90059-P. [Google Scholar]
- K.H. Bendiksen, M. Langsholt, L. Liu, An experimental investigation of the motion of long bubbles in high viscosity slug flow in horizontal pipes, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 104, 60–73 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.03.010. [Google Scholar]
- T.T. Wan, W.L. Loh, D.T. Nguyen, V.H. Perez, V.K. Premanadhan, Diameter scaling correlations for near atmospheric air–water slug velocities in horizontal pipe, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 172, 349–359 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.09.025. [Google Scholar]
- A. Archibong Eso, Y. Zhao, H. Yeung, ColloquiumComparison of electrical capacitance tomography and gamma densitometer measurement in viscous oil-gas flows, in: Presented at the the 2013 ukm fst postgraduate colloquium: in Proceedings of the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Faculty of Science and Technology 2013 Postgraduate, (Selangor, Malaysia, 2014), p. 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4872090. [Google Scholar]
- Y.D. Baba, A.E. Archibong, A.M. Aliyu, A.I. Ameen, Slug frequency in high viscosity oil-gas two-phase flow: Experiment and prediction, Flow Meas. Instrum. 54,109–123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2017.01.002. [Google Scholar]
- B. Gokcal, A.S. Al-Sarkhi, C. Sarica, E.M. Al-Safran, Prediction of slug frequency for high-viscosity oils in horizontal pipes, SPE Proj. Facil. Constr. 5(3), 136–144 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2118/124057-PA. [Google Scholar]
- A. Archibong-Eso, Y. Baba, A. Aliyu, Y. Zhao, W. Yan, H. Yeung, On slug frequency in concurrent high viscosity liquid and gas flow, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 163, 600–610 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.12.071. [Google Scholar]
- S. Wijayanta, Deendarlianto Indarto, A. Prasetyo, A.Z. Hudaya, The effect of the liquid physical properties on the wave frequency and wave velocity of co-current gas–liquid stratified two-phase flow in a horizontal pipe, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 158, 104300 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2022.104300. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.
