Open Access
Review
Table 2
Research overview of effect of pipe diameter on interfacial wave behavior in horizontal two-phase flow.
| Author | Dpipe (mm) | Flow regime | Fluid | Methodology | jf (m/s) | jg (m/s) | Aim of study |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreussi and Bendiksen [60] | 50, 90 | Intermittent | Air–water | Experimental (Conductance probes) | – | – | Analysis of interfacial structure |
| Andritsos et al. [42] | 25.4, 95.3 | Dispersed, Separated | Air–water | Experimental (Probes, transducers) | 0.015–0.5 | Up to 100 | Diameter impact on air–water flow transitions |
| Widyatama et al. [61] | 16, 50 | Intermittent | Air–water | Experimental (Image processing) | 0.2–0.77 | 0.7–2.83 | Analyse interfacial behaviour of slug flow in horizontal pipes |
| Mandal et al. [50] | 25, 12 | – | Kerosene–water | Experimental (Optical probes) | 0.2–1.1 (water) | 0.08–0.2 (kerosene) | Study diameter effect on oil-water flow patterns |
| Kadri et al. [48] | 52, 60 | Stratified, Slug | Air–water | Numerical (MAST simulations) | 0.17–0.22 | 0.5–6.0 | Investigate diameter scaling of flow transitions |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.